X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s= default; b=upEXB77wZxYaHxA/M8ZekEFd+jU23tqa08M6ZzowJ00iWoeocYvOP I1aCnSr9a7xeRO8I2iaIIinBdUqzrjmBuBTuJQ5pWfCoMaG5cU8tuqb70WmPiNso FOEK2pIICa7SJRI4yCfIQn2R7FVZIWZpMMfGuIbX+OLneiHXLaiquw= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default; bh=GgFO/CMajP/gFjqtdeuFb2jq2Xk=; b=ovvdYbnUycN11YF08F8SEotc6pZb lGykr7UGcmwtSXIZ17lFAM2U9vGkRBjXyyfs028zQwLACEVB0+0QmBgT26N/Vj/t Fge+/zhkHKrMWV4QwbLMBNL9VP8d6WDgIfdgvtle6+8I0tkelmVGzVLWHPk72+0X N3sm8f5Eo7+tdkY= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 17:07:29 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Fresh Cygwin-64 install reports post-install errors for bash Message-ID: <20130423150729.GF26397@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <5F8AAC04F9616747BC4CC0E803D5907D0AF6D974 AT MLBXv04 DOT nih DOT gov> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5F8AAC04F9616747BC4CC0E803D5907D0AF6D974@MLBXv04.nih.gov> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Why did you start a new thread for this reply?!? On Apr 23 14:27, Lavrentiev, Anton (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] wrote: > > Probably, for some weird reason, the 000-post-install was not run > > before other scripts. > > Indeed, it wasn't. Here's the sequence of postinstall steps as logged, > and it is far off from being alphabetical (if that's to ensure the order of > things): That's why this is still called test release. There are missing dependencies and that might confuse setup's dependency resolution algorithm. You just have to live with it for now. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple