X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	 q=dns; s=default; b=DEY3+LHw/Dx8AB+Qg50X3bBHvTOe6O3diIOBXnMlKWs
	jWyJqFAk7ICeZ4v2nUgJJfruhwBr300PyLCT/4MB0G7Jo2Q0fRo1jfPOdV56LKw4
	kUjvkj07Hfx+I81VrzL+0fRNsG2JkKxara3SzJ+PQsMjWS89PbseiRBt2zsZNmuI
	=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	 s=default; bh=JNQvaI7I/vS51bzZJ6ONvF4XMeU=; b=IObPn53OQGlT4nDZq
	OAKD7GD5VNbWh5Bcye9+ce2+IQwzoxAg6yDzJI4bkHdXigq4MUS7vasUjFranYGb
	rT/dcUtLgEFYypGeKtXjzi5VZfsKtjYRk5JbrnwMo7FGBqS/OXmFsBLuMr4qJpOT
	RTWU1UEl3YaEmDWzMm15JAM5QM=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
Message-ID: <51730CD7.4050705@towo.net>
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 23:47:03 +0200
From: Thomas Wolff <towo AT towo DOT net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: mintty and Control-` , Control-~
References: <CADd11yXqNrSfOEj4Lmf5KyVUL0TWkosEb=3yNprCyLLk_PK-iQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>	<514B2CEF DOT 3090100 AT cs DOT utoronto DOT ca>	<CAHWeT-ay8NpcVV+z34wEvwd11LkT8L0ib+AiFE5gGmDT_F39VQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>	<5172FA88 DOT 6010001 AT towo DOT net> <CAHWeT-a5xUw34a41hyM27-=5kBUdEUYg7cXnjaz-T+QXrSQeVA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHWeT-a5xUw34a41hyM27-=5kBUdEUYg7cXnjaz-T+QXrSQeVA@mail.gmail.com>
X-TagToolbar-Keys: D20130420234703422
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Am 20.04.2013 22:53, schrieb Andy Koppe:
> On 20 April 2013 21:28, Thomas Wolff wrote:
>>> In order to make them useful without enabling modifyOtherKeys mode,
>>> how about if Ctrl combinations with backtick (ASCII 0x60), opening and
>>> closing brace (0x7B and 0x7D), pipe (0x7C), and tilde (0x7E) were
>>> mapped to C1 control characters (in the U+0080 to U+009E range).
>> I don't think it's useful to support C1 control characters because virtually
>> nobody will ever want to input them via keyboard;
> I don't know of applications that need those by default either; the
> point is to make such key combinations available for custom mappings
> in places such as ~/.inputrc and ~/.vimrc.
Ah, yes. Maybe a hint in the Keycodes description might encourage such a 
use case.
>
>> even more if only a random subset of C1 can be supported this is only
>> confusing.
> The entire set is supported already. See
> http://code.google.com/p/mintty/wiki/Keycodes#Ctrl.
Ah, again. However, a custom mapping as mentioned might want to 
distinguish all keys,
so still I wouldn't map Control-~ and -` to already mapped ones.
Maybe extend the "Number and symbol keys" scheme, or use the 
modifyOtherKeys sequences here by default?

Thomas

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple