X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=aMHz9Tm5V4/Se4Y4i5ITkYVKYWDAJftQaOrPMWEoRal j9DF8o/VAMadl+kXxdDvS9bg6cCvYx33/q3LM/z3tczfxJY/MI0pPoEJoaUDVfbN /kD1NutMi6M5r6VycxEAes5N8Jlor/cVh/toATqHjIn04Ygknefq09eFbrXE6BDI = DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=qZWK/J+9Us63UhxSCDh+2jJcz5g=; b=W0JPjX7e/RSth6wr/ M7SBCL6M+5P7N1wta9huwJLgVdbGVjIubT+7nf9W/iAmm2qPbfx+bwr2yCNSR1vm R1oyMEJ7d2TenvL27ckdaWhbNExFcKtN6IDIrDTW1Am8vZUrRAw95j7yfSXJq8l0 N0YNee71agMpUcJF6ccCx/nO8U= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,TW_YG autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Message-ID: <516D514E.8000908@etr-usa.com> Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 07:25:34 -0600 From: Warren Young User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Cygwin-L Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: expat 2.1.0-1 References: <51671F38 DOT 2080403 AT gmail DOT com> In-Reply-To: <51671F38.2080403@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 4/11/2013 14:38, Dave Korn wrote: > > The static archive /usr/lib/libexpat.a was present in 2.0.1-1(*) and is > missing in 2.1.0-1(**), was that intentional? I think I got that, um, "feature" for free when I converted to cygport for that package. Someone is passing --disable-static to the configure script, and it isn't me. I've fixed this with CYGCONF_ARGS="--enable-static" The static library does now appear in the -devel package. The .a is about 3x the size of the .dll. Is that normal, or am I supposed to be stripping the .a before packaging it? Does someone actually want this static library? I'm going to RFU it anyway, since I've gone to the trouble of fixing it, but I was curious if it actually mattered to someone. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple