X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=Ax d55YGahqBzKOv+CndzKqM+SHE3TQnkHX7+nND2GPuz81u3JaZIZKa82zimRi+qt5 7dLVCfInb8rBRZC/miAi+6pyV67DclYVMt4LYCGT1a8m+Qt85KixwtzMOlp5qL7H jBiESfsUViHsfoenLQV83qeEaYgDi7IPxnhk2k3Rc= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; s=default; bh=3veHGjGM gte6dgaH+AV7FnoR83Q=; b=EkCpU7tOJmCpgHccTcJLoePGLYU22i+/TEx9I6po 7DRXklFuPF+fkqhZ5moADD7XaRLZcrBmLda+NfxJhKLXYJ8HF9HPjp77wkFvXSdE KpXnaEMpVyEdCeguYkOiqWd3SFLcOSjHCkoYRDsNa4D9AQBQ0d6IrTfdfMIfvPZC 2Rk= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,TW_BJ,TW_YG autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.181.134 with SMTP id dw6mr162124igc.68.1366078329671; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 19:12:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <516C8011.3060102@users.sourceforge.net> References: <516C8011 DOT 3060102 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 22:12:09 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Issue with binutils-2.23.1-1 From: Chris Sutcliffe To: The Cygwin Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On 15 April 2013 18:32, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: > On 2013-04-15 07:54, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: >> >> On 6 March 2013 08:40, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: >>> >>> I noticed a problem after upgrading to the 2.23.1-1 release of >>> binutils that cygport was no longer generating debuginfo files. After >>> digging in to it a little and following up on the cygwin-ports mailing >>> list, Yaakov determined that the objdump included in the 2.23.1 >>> release of binutils does not handle the "-l" flag properly. Reverting >>> to 2.22.51-2 solved the issue for me and Yaakov confirmed that the >>> issue does not exist in CVS HEAD either. >> >> >> This issue has resurfaced in the 2.23.52.20130309 release of bintuils >> currently shipping with Cygwin. My cygport based packages are no >> longer producing debuginfo packages. > > > WFM. Are you having issues with all packages or just some? Build issue on my end, sorry for the noise. Chris -- Chris Sutcliffe http://emergedesktop.org http://www.google.com/profiles/ir0nh34d -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple