X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	 q=dns; s=default; b=x7D70RyUQQN0MT7F+s6zZtFhMxXACVzklsliNaCwo5E
	NMUypybmTgOpPS2I2DQA2BoYjZSjHOI7S9Kb1HtU/xSlZw2LA+9Ap0Ag6p3kmzGF
	z3Ow6oDCE29RBx83RujitrTMcHDMiZDb3jDSkRrbTADcTX0kG0T2rRa/FbSgktzE
	=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	 s=default; bh=bc+538aKrllk9xntNET9VSvWvOM=; b=boemgIDIirq1u++68
	u+6DLSZeKAXYNBHgPWA71LNylqnt+lmCndywt0fT6FPPffa094USqGLBkFWzzMNb
	10yZY5qz5byOS8oIsO9JKlzTwU5mZw5wdcDC1xkVPduO5qJKiS+0MZl9gnQaGex7
	mcrwDgHbY3ujR73M+25SlS5cYg=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,TW_BJ,TW_YG autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Received: by 10.50.78.202 with SMTP id d10mr6466183igx.69.1366065168459;        Mon, 15 Apr 2013 15:32:48 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <516C8011.3060102@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 17:32:49 -0500
From: "Yaakov (Cygwin/X)" <yselkowitz AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Issue with binutils-2.23.1-1
References: <CAGHJv4eeEsAoZUz2LOov1q3OKe0ZR5rNvrotLjH5JGadisro+A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAGHJv4dbEZS52DWXey8+sgmyR1Mp+yK0Q1Dg4LBAx84KMiSiNw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <CAGHJv4dbEZS52DWXey8+sgmyR1Mp+yK0Q1Dg4LBAx84KMiSiNw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 2013-04-15 07:54, Chris Sutcliffe wrote:
> On 6 March 2013 08:40, Chris Sutcliffe wrote:
>> I noticed a problem after upgrading to the 2.23.1-1 release of
>> binutils that cygport was no longer generating debuginfo files.  After
>> digging in to it a little and following up on the cygwin-ports mailing
>> list, Yaakov determined that the objdump included in the 2.23.1
>> release of binutils does not handle the "-l" flag properly.  Reverting
>> to 2.22.51-2 solved the issue for me and Yaakov confirmed that the
>> issue does not exist in CVS HEAD either.
>
> This issue has resurfaced in the 2.23.52.20130309 release of bintuils
> currently shipping with Cygwin.  My cygport based packages are no
> longer producing debuginfo packages.

WFM.  Are you having issues with all packages or just some?


Yaakov


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple