X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=Yn/pIYCZlDiMpQRjAQplCWWr/SbLxs+O4fE7ZvEZcsRqTf1mMPxkL
	5PllnU867HYGx/ByvpLK3XzmsDXaRUYgKcIo0iQ6wDQ/vArcy9upgdK1pESE5ZOJ
	tGl5TUKptZiWdQm73ISTANdQqwejAUm5iggiDI+M4rYGjj9gTLtjJ0=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default;
	 bh=EfkvsVCUCyj6fwUwx/torgQutPc=; b=uH/0j2tOWezNOPpdhhcuNz6uZb+E
	zAmy83kP4xkQtEDS6YiahtIypfZYfK+qJk52TD/Cbw5TZKo2tGK4WcIpphH3N6Qh
	bEBVvhZHPBZq3p8bifZdGC+xIvyJHGoC2nNKWAe+I8JKwUV0EDpZjQTTjPrPOdLp
	EB0jNu1Z4BnYrtI=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Mail-Handler: Dyn Standard SMTP by Dyn
X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse AT dyndns DOT com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/sendlabs/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information)
X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX1/CCmE92ATsP8RwGo3HTeuj
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 13:18:18 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Issue with binutils-2.23.1-1
Message-ID: <20130415171818.GA3547@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <CAGHJv4eeEsAoZUz2LOov1q3OKe0ZR5rNvrotLjH5JGadisro+A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAGHJv4dbEZS52DWXey8+sgmyR1Mp+yK0Q1Dg4LBAx84KMiSiNw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20130415132155 DOT GC24092 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20130415134809 DOT GA4639 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20130415143733 DOT GC5992 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20130415143954 DOT GB4639 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20130415151154 DOT GA7850 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20130415165245 DOT GC4639 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20130415165245.GC4639@calimero.vinschen.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)

On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 06:52:45PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>I was just pointing out the version mismatch.  The package is called
>2.23.51, while the binaries claim to be 2.23.52.  I did not comment
>on the behaviour.

Yes, I got that.  I was trying to move the discussion away from version
confusion and into the realm of fixing the actual problem.  That's why I
asked Yaakov for comment since he was referenced in the original thread
as understanding the problem.

cgf

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple