X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s= default; b=Z9NkLlUAq9DecPBJQQ7MkunLwcwLYeLE1X2TvXtY+EtH8WBeuVD90 gjVeZR7heWzYhfpnrMdjYtZb+jS5Fwmc6fKe50KwXJ8JgVO/pmCGBL/Xyu7XZZyE JT0FnLqIOP56mJ9LRkeHPP7pV1tX9geOx4rDayZLLyKfz07IhxMz8Y= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default; bh=tihqcOpM9SA08sAP0pEoH8Gnpow=; b=WkiJl1Al6uLMryi8A8gkdAbC4ZIR enOhG++tp7SnPMPlg3HdFXaT7q15R6O7AWumb2OA1/sY3nHzBD2DwSPZLc4+eHK2 AQTafgY7q+bKnPhlvkT65Yk+dU1iJR6QD07bqea0GBkvetFDJi2XQ0FemVuLZQgj 0EcxFE84gQr4uLE= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_05,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,TW_BJ,TW_YG autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Mail-Handler: Dyn Standard SMTP by Dyn X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse AT dyndns DOT com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/sendlabs/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information) X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX1+7CrYg/Y+iIwLph1+H8fzo Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 11:11:54 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Issue with binutils-2.23.1-1 Message-ID: <20130415151154.GA7850@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20130415132155 DOT GC24092 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20130415134809 DOT GA4639 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20130415143733 DOT GC5992 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20130415143954 DOT GB4639 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130415143954.GB4639@calimero.vinschen.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 04:39:54PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >On Apr 15 10:37, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 03:48:09PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> >On Apr 15 15:21, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> >> On Apr 15 08:54, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: >> >> > Hi All, >> >> > >> >> > On 6 March 2013 08:40, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: >> >> > > I noticed a problem after upgrading to the 2.23.1-1 release of >> >> > > binutils that cygport was no longer generating debuginfo files. After >> >> > > digging in to it a little and following up on the cygwin-ports mailing >> >> > > list, Yaakov determined that the objdump included in the 2.23.1 >> >> > > release of binutils does not handle the "-l" flag properly. Reverting >> >> > > to 2.22.51-2 solved the issue for me and Yaakov confirmed that the >> >> > > issue does not exist in CVS HEAD either. >> >> > >> >> > This issue has resurfaced in the 2.23.52.20130309 release of bintuils >> >> > currently shipping with Cygwin. My cygport based packages are no >> >> > longer producing debuginfo packages. >> >> >> >> Erm... 2.23.52-1 is a 64bit-only package. I created all the debuginfo >> >> packages with this version. 32 bit is at 2.23.51-1, and I'm pretty >> >> sure I created the latest OpenSSH packages with that version, including >> >> debuginfo. >> > >> >Oh, hmm. The 2.23.51-1 package actually contains the 2.23.52.20130309 >> >binutils files, so never mind what I wrote. >> >> Just to be clear: The current 32-bit version of binutils is 2.23.51-1. >> It was released to address the problems with objdump introduced by a, >> er, "illegal" upload by someone who was confused about binutils >> maintainership. There is no 32-bit version named 2.23.52.20130309 >> or 2.23.1-1. > >If you run `ld --version' on ld from the 2.23.51-1 package, it returns >"GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.23.52.20130309" Again, the version that was uploaded in March was to fix the problem reported in this thread. It's odd that it took a month for someone to notice a problem if the problem is still there. The original thread did not have an explanation of what the actual problem with objdump was so I don't really have any way of investigating it. Yaakov, can you explain what you think the problem is? cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple