X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s= default; b=ENq5Nh8Z/gCBkd6d1h97AT81Y3X3fE2ImTOq4+uLu7zTBkS1BqWng PJhJIuIp/0v5A2180IH9unDEUIzaykWx/Gfv64Kwzg5QpdOfgCImF9oK9qXqZONn qcqc6sjeEA29lm2wun/uRHECxdMdmhZjjavh82vEFX6wYjICyt26xU= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default; bh=7KkQgbZjtRMDPS7U4Yz17vfVk2g=; b=sJynOKVJFBXWx44sq4Yp3zq7Gp+y 9T+rwWZ8VFPY7X6alYxNIQL9hJEenlzU2/5DPucxXZUwvW28cgSgD6XjcnvNIHSw FEHZcEpRUV+THIjdlH3Mn3yccbO0HUPIMvUs2fJL1fFfCDtYKRp5MyXwfRiHeamJ IULKID5YtXxKeC8= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_40,TW_BJ,TW_YG autolearn=no version=3.3.1 Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 16:39:54 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Issue with binutils-2.23.1-1 Message-ID: <20130415143954.GB4639@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20130415132155 DOT GC24092 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20130415134809 DOT GA4639 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20130415143733 DOT GC5992 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130415143733.GC5992@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) On Apr 15 10:37, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 03:48:09PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >On Apr 15 15:21, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >> On Apr 15 08:54, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: > >> > Hi All, > >> > > >> > On 6 March 2013 08:40, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: > >> > > I noticed a problem after upgrading to the 2.23.1-1 release of > >> > > binutils that cygport was no longer generating debuginfo files. After > >> > > digging in to it a little and following up on the cygwin-ports mailing > >> > > list, Yaakov determined that the objdump included in the 2.23.1 > >> > > release of binutils does not handle the "-l" flag properly. Reverting > >> > > to 2.22.51-2 solved the issue for me and Yaakov confirmed that the > >> > > issue does not exist in CVS HEAD either. > >> > > >> > This issue has resurfaced in the 2.23.52.20130309 release of bintuils > >> > currently shipping with Cygwin. My cygport based packages are no > >> > longer producing debuginfo packages. > >> > >> Erm... 2.23.52-1 is a 64bit-only package. I created all the debuginfo > >> packages with this version. 32 bit is at 2.23.51-1, and I'm pretty > >> sure I created the latest OpenSSH packages with that version, including > >> debuginfo. > > > >Oh, hmm. The 2.23.51-1 package actually contains the 2.23.52.20130309 > >binutils files, so never mind what I wrote. > > Just to be clear: The current 32-bit version of binutils is 2.23.51-1. > It was released to address the problems with objdump introduced by a, > er, "illegal" upload by someone who was confused about binutils > maintainership. There is no 32-bit version named 2.23.52.20130309 > or 2.23.1-1. If you run `ld --version' on ld from the 2.23.51-1 package, it returns "GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.23.52.20130309" Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple