X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s= default; b=YC0f5gOaR0NN6AH/uFPVVgz1KuiJ2TZE28o3bD5NaGwN9K9X4fDXl soT0jwBaP0oKsnzYZRUYhOFtqFL8nHn1lJC/CvXdSS29obcLb64ZyCR2Ni/Yu74+ 85trdZO5rUSaJNV7FS+ySVPTcaHbIm9tKRybbCcZxSpYPG6ia26Ozg= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default; bh=rwcT11QA5nQ2Tk47xgodSS3erpM=; b=DlgGP1TFXxwyDoIsf4hqi+lNmOr1 UcZ70Qly7N0wKBPJc5drtp5d77SFwSaPBxylXZCVdn5R++TBaSwdpCqjE72jczFp YrfvKs4QHicL5Z2+qPtGgn14SPhO9wIq/wJM7W9LNLNnUdDXWJe1Ks7kKRkKIThl 2pzclHKBep99gHE= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_05,TW_BJ,TW_YG autolearn=no version=3.3.1 Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 15:48:09 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Issue with binutils-2.23.1-1 Message-ID: <20130415134809.GA4639@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20130415132155 DOT GC24092 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130415132155.GC24092@calimero.vinschen.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) On Apr 15 15:21, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Apr 15 08:54, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > On 6 March 2013 08:40, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: > > > I noticed a problem after upgrading to the 2.23.1-1 release of > > > binutils that cygport was no longer generating debuginfo files. After > > > digging in to it a little and following up on the cygwin-ports mailing > > > list, Yaakov determined that the objdump included in the 2.23.1 > > > release of binutils does not handle the "-l" flag properly. Reverting > > > to 2.22.51-2 solved the issue for me and Yaakov confirmed that the > > > issue does not exist in CVS HEAD either. > > > > This issue has resurfaced in the 2.23.52.20130309 release of bintuils > > currently shipping with Cygwin. My cygport based packages are no > > longer producing debuginfo packages. > > Erm... 2.23.52-1 is a 64bit-only package. I created all the debuginfo > packages with this version. 32 bit is at 2.23.51-1, and I'm pretty > sure I created the latest OpenSSH packages with that version, including > debuginfo. Oh, hmm. The 2.23.51-1 package actually contains the 2.23.52.20130309 binutils files, so never mind what I wrote. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple