X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=l5L4xlFYSZXg44loEbBJVfDWCPulYxH91M8EcO5lXlR SK51Y2ab9lwVxC0r49rxuW7DhuajBw1gNhgznK4LGWjC0cpNYDWmwO1JvIpicfVu rwI1NiVLUjUFP9rs2vW1sUn3lkPi3PRmhz9OVOW2H3gLA6Wu4axqVHtgnYzbGgCw = DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=M4xxf9xq1v+eSwA1wz8MyVE9XQI=; b=CL/2avkuzM3uTYgjm YL9k6HB7jgnglgawjO2Z0wMyGxEAnI718nniO81wgbH5fKObzdItP5+BtsJiVTqC iCJa2PlHMVhVbSqs2sU1xxWv1OKWHFkgecKiaLav1wm4+CrRlgr44xzP3a9zVf7I oVSKz0sslXtS7T1czgwjucPmro= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-5.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,TW_BJ,TW_YG autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Received: by 10.194.95.198 with SMTP id dm6mr18494223wjb.6.1364864109809; Mon, 01 Apr 2013 17:55:09 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <515A2D12.7070303@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2013 01:57:54 +0100 From: Dave Korn User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Cygwin Mailing List Subject: Re: cygport debuginfo problem: packaging fails. References: <51594BDA DOT 8070600 AT gmail DOT com> In-Reply-To: <51594BDA.8070600@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 01/04/2013 09:56, Dave Korn wrote: > Hi Yaakov et al., > > I'm confused by the output from cygport (0.11.3) when building GCC. During > the packaging step, after the final binary package from PKG_NAMES has been > tarballed, I see: > >> *** Info: No debug files, skipping debuginfo subpackage OK, so this means that ${D}/usr/src/debug does not exist, and that's because nothing was installed there by __prepdebugsrc(). That has something to do with the fact that none of my source files got listed in ${T}/.dbgsrc.out, and I think that in turn is because objdumping the built exes doesn't reveal any paths to source files that begin with '/usr/src/debug'. That seems to be because no -fdebug-prefix-map options got added during the build stage. Or rather, the options did get added, but that was before /usr/bin/cygport included my .cygport script, which went and unset them again. I'm not sure why I originally included that any more, I left a comment about how setting them in the environment "confuses auto-detection process during gcc build stages", which isn't as clear as I now wish, so I guess I'll just delete that bit and try again. Looks like the problem is my fault, anyway; pardon the noise. cheers, DaveK -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple