X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=i6syZ9AAPCoRcrE2mPJnXKDyscjfl6cL7yBkkIWTL+j 12cA+EvCb7jfIr1E/GbSe0erv1yy6eFZo+z9okrzvq3b50VuDNi5eljI+Epyrjd9 grqnf5BIlVzIcfT9Prm3YYxX9DCJmhBBvFV9l8fOCexfftDh9pweUuhYtj+SHx8c = DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=da+I3yFW2ZUEMliJn89C4BqMB9A=; b=Vw/YmUT1OQeDPjsoy B8z7UetreEKM1r9X+YJmgD6IATWIXIaGOrEist9s5u2lR/TUPehGftrgESEa7BAg BYk6sV1njBb/lLcdHgvivvEHAZkQBHYZxztiB6cjRvo9ZXpfED2N0iPXZhxEgcVK TQjT9Kzr/ZMmt7nAbA2rHYJSbc= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Message-ID: <515059C1.5040200@cs.utoronto.ca> Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 10:05:53 -0400 From: Ryan Johnson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130215 Thunderbird/17.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Fwd: reboot command behaves different on Linux References: <514CE853 DOT 2000000 AT gmail DOT com> <20130323223138 DOT GB40309 AT justpickone DOT org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 25/03/2013 9:40 AM, Earnie Boyd wrote: > On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 5:53 AM, Frank Fesevur wrote: >> 2013/3/23 David T-G: >>> % This would still conflict with the -H of the ones above, but I have no >>> % problem with it. Anyone against changing hibernate to -H? >>> >>> What about 'b' for hi'b'ernate? >> That was my original suggestion, but Anthony liked the -H better. >> >> I have given it a thought over the weekend and since the -H conflicts >> with -H of the Linux shutdown commands, I think I prefer the -b as >> short for hibernate. > To me -b sounds like 'b;inary how about -s for 's'leep since sleep is > synonymous with hibernate. Sleep is synonymous with suspend(resume from low-power state) not hibernate (resume from powered-off state). Ryan -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple