X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=default; b=Itka KdAwtEW5LUamC4U2raS6K9ZojpXiFqgSEyLa5P07XB2fMpsRWAGtEC7RhiNXE8YJ itDyPCka+1JMXoV8bAwb27XrfmSabN1dZ4sKAJUjI5DkhRuTqiHPzoLDOnAgaw1m U8Iu8zXczqg5TJIDytQdyzpSlLUb1RhTCG0J7oI= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default; bh=8QJKZRJ032 Y3eEfbpC3rTGNHSIA=; b=Gz6ch9BBqPMXPvsmNgF9ig2ZQ3lD2f4swZBMBEwyKE AebUKT+0+suR3FFygfH04kl0xWU+lqa5XnVM8CUsWU1mm1ZHio/HBFUtJCyrkRWz gG0c/xC3VV9vp/sWBycG2+RgATovChryZjIjh91E0XGAJcR3OPV+rVZ0CiSq2xVz A= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2013 21:29:51 -0400 From: David T-G To: "CygWin Users' List" Subject: Re: : reboot command behaves different on Linux Message-ID: <20130324012951.GC40309@justpickone.org> References: <514CE853 DOT 2000000 AT gmail DOT com> <462421374 DOT 20130324051330 AT mtu-net DOT ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="zxscdqhVGwTkkwBg" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <462421374.20130324051330@mtu-net.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Virus-Found: No --zxscdqhVGwTkkwBg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Andrey, et al -- ...and then Andrey Repin said... %=20 ... %=20 % If anyone can explain the difference between "halt" and "power off" in the % terms of Linux 'shutdown' man page, I would probably vote for one of the % choices. [snip] On some machines, halting can leave you at a BIOS/firmware prompt but still powered on, whereas powering off really kills all power once the shutdown is complete. I can't say how the former behaves on your average basic PC but suspect that the last step of halting is to power off since I know of no way to get to the BIOS other than at boot time. HTH & HANW :-D --=20 David T-G See http://justpickone.org/davidtg/email/ See http://justpickone.org/davidtg/tofu.txt I appreciate everyone's individual tactic in the Spam Wars, but I just don't have the time or energy to captcha or register or whatever to be able to send you email. --zxscdqhVGwTkkwBg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFRTlcPGb7uCXufRwARAonSAKDP3VhwUtxzXsh4WStYueBVPSX7OQCgjtX7 ybjAuCqbvoyflWLLsiAC1gM= =GrYV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --zxscdqhVGwTkkwBg--