X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=bObjbgeDNZTpSdM/ o4lcFRAWF15e4AWlbpY+Zxo4lVkzLf0k6vsDkFp13smvrbDmfwKW0l7ELEjGNmf/ WPcx5rN3M2k2A7LRUKILedCqPZxjg7AsGuhFm6RBhrSF0g28xSy15k7HDwtfx33l E7Bd7VQWXZcSm5SuZOq9Qc0EmaM= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=HEEZM2qsV0PrWoHcSEGbMr wRIlY=; b=RiqvA8yab9sJQKMLgsG6nE4Q8OxtUx1NixHdsiQsdm3z1D+0ZMvDJo HKz7J/tmyrfyR7RICu9mGOb6TWou23nlLTVpGUei7tIuMusNPITGyWiKFkdR1kA6 QGT8FhopGCSYSjcdGamMXDYUzZsp6PWOvj07m3Di9Bfz/AXJPF/fc= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_THEBAT,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.1 Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2013 05:13:30 +0400 From: Andrey Repin Reply-To: Andrey Repin Message-ID: <462421374.20130324051330@mtu-net.ru> To: Frank Fesevur , cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: : reboot command behaves different on Linux In-Reply-To: References: <514CE853 DOT 2000000 AT gmail DOT com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Greetings, Frank Fesevur! >> I thought about it for a while myself before posting but I concluded your >> choice was a good one: the usefulness of -h for hibernate probably >> outweighed the benefits of retaining compatibility with a more traditional >> (BSD) Unix shutdown. I checked to see if POSIX had anything specified but >> it's not concerned with the shutdown command. > It seems there is not such thing as a *general* shutdown command. > "Every" distribution has its own. Just picked three: > http://linuxmanpages.net/manpages/fedora18/man8/shutdown.8.html > http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/precise/man8/shutdown.8.html > http://manpages.debian.net/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=shutdown&apropos=0&sektion=8&manpath=Debian+6.0+squeeze&format=html&locale=en > Although they all agree on -r -h -H -P -k and -c. Also noticed that > the Fedora shutdown doesn't require the time option. It defaults to 1 > minute. >> Having thought about it bit more, I'd like to suggest an upper case -H as >> the option for hibernate. > This would still conflict with the -H of the ones above, but I have no > problem with it. Anyone against changing hibernate to -H? If anyone can explain the difference between "halt" and "power off" in the terms of Linux 'shutdown' man page, I would probably vote for one of the choices. Especially since the Debian (and Ubuntu) man page wording on -h confuse me. I can't understand, how a choice would be "left up to the system". -- WBR, Andrey Repin (anrdaemon AT freemail DOT ru) 24.03.2013, <05:08> Sorry for my terrible english... -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple