X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org X-Received: by 10.205.26.7 with SMTP id rk7mr6254345bkb.60.1363588357717; Sun, 17 Mar 2013 23:32:37 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5146B4FF.3090307@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 07:32:31 +0100 From: marco atzeri User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130307 Thunderbird/17.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: problems with COM running native win32 applications through cygwin's bash References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 3/18/2013 7:26 AM, Edward Peschko wrote: > to get a native 64 bit environment, which allows the COM calls to > happen for diskshadow. > > I'm assuming that there isn't a 64 bit cygwin port? I would think that > would solve lots of issues - the number of native 32 bit installations > is dropping rapidly, and I think that going forward issues like the > above will become more and more common. not yet, it is on first infancy steps: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2013-03/msg00070.html > > Ed -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple