X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2013 15:38:45 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Shouldn't gcc-4 depend on libmpfr4 ? Message-ID: <20130307143845.GB12359@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <5131CD7E DOT 8050001 AT gmail DOT com> <20130304090904 DOT GA5468 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20130304161925 DOT GA4078 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <51388D05 DOT 3080803 AT gmail DOT com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Hi guys, On Mar 7 14:13, Achim Gratz wrote: > David Billinghurst gmail.com> writes: > > Still lurking, but real life has led me in other directions for the last > > year or so. > > > > I am more than happy for someone else to adopt these packages. I have > > had good intentions, and built a couple of test packages, but haven't > > actually done anything useful for a while. > > Hi David, > > I have working packages that finally fit in with the current Cygwin > distribution. I can send the cygport files to you if you want to update them > yourself, otherwise I'll have to find time for a clean install to rebuild these > on before they are ready for update. Shall I mark your packages as ORPHANED for now, David? Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple