X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_PGP_SIGNED,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,TW_BJ,TW_YG X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org X-Received: by 10.68.138.225 with SMTP id qt1mr48930294pbb.82.1362608132423; Wed, 06 Mar 2013 14:15:32 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5137BFF2.40904@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2013 06:15:14 +0800 From: JonY <10walls AT gmail DOT com> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/20080213 Thunderbird/2.0.0.12 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: The Cygwin Mailing List Subject: Re: Issue with binutils-2.23.1-1 References: <20130306165307 DOT GA2655 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> In-Reply-To: <20130306165307.GA2655@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="----enig2FWBGOHEBTBLTGLILNKTC" X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com ------enig2FWBGOHEBTBLTGLILNKTC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 3/7/2013 00:53, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 08:40:32AM -0500, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: >> I noticed a problem after upgrading to the 2.23.1-1 release of >> binutils that cygport was no longer generating debuginfo files. After >> digging in to it a little and following up on the cygwin-ports mailing >> list, Yaakov determined that the objdump included in the 2.23.1 >> release of binutils does not handle the "-l" flag properly. Reverting >> to 2.22.51-2 solved the issue for me and Yaakov confirmed that the >> issue does not exist in CVS HEAD either. >=20 > Well, this is a strange development. >=20 > I never uploaded a binutils-2.23.1-1 to sourceware. >=20 > I've deleted the 2.23.1-1 version. Sorry, I uploaded it as I thought it was also done by Dave, I asked over IRC if I should remove it but got no response. Anyway, binutils need updating, care to update it? ------enig2FWBGOHEBTBLTGLILNKTC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (MingW32) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJRN7/7AAoJEHE7X+KcFF1FMJwP/3u7iCq+MteBro25RWrDZUwS Aghs2SXgp/tREf/uIPezsvRpcT9nmevbfjRZBUUXPRN2uH6oEkIDYYrgQbuOjiqq Nc735Fp3aeRN24Mg7AsckAuYVZTqdUC/kS35X5HigPXUL9vvdNeGxYlJ6GQ2hZWM GAI5vnZuYrz8h23OgaMTKJ0mtm6dS8g6wDjZaKY9OG8vSSjoUCsAvJABEltJcHeG milsrrefdUj4FnU9F/fspgY3s1TQkFWcxyXiD3upo1DTtxIaCgrrPLIzFXA5WSB2 4L9RNfaCkII+C4IfGGCH0GE7mwoMJH/v1U2ON4hcs5QXQEebULSW7Bee/+icwkI3 kHNLEtQd67zgeJn8RbENiBymgX4bTTWkjRxJDPMnMzoi6Sp3Ynz6tA221SnE2IDl LHsokIozkp4u77G60j5whqoVWfDjqMMHD1FAR4XcodbThnCbTW0/iHsx9cEF+J5/ QyN+FipTsHuwgvJ3cXWEBB04EWJR/leIBb6Khe+ey2vPnj7SRZkRhxyzfaX21txV xU3HiEsBUDKzjzLzYCZO9T1WldlG/uN8WA8RH+LLhXEW0TBgks27xfpdKsgfle87 HCMhJdwOoZ3febK7Xk05RvJkNeYDSeq/P9E8wqRFsJO5vp8rS0UuksueeiL0l4eB 8++wAUTwtsEIBJHdiO0O =VxT9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------enig2FWBGOHEBTBLTGLILNKTC--