X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.9 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FSL_HELO_BARE_IP_2,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: Achim Gratz <Stromeko AT NexGo DOT DE>
Subject: Re: Shouldn't gcc-4 depend on libmpfr4 ?
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 11:08:05 +0000 (UTC)
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <loom.20130306T120329-190@post.gmane.org>
References: <CAEhDDbDwsH=CvsJXFFTgbrEhVp_-sUU-q-=tJONYaKP=m95Weg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>	<5131CD7E DOT 8050001 AT gmail DOT com>	<loom DOT 20130304T080048-222 AT post DOT gmane DOT org>	<20130304090904 DOT GA5468 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>	<loom DOT 20130304T110538-61 AT post DOT gmane DOT org>	<20130304161925 DOT GA4078 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>	<loom DOT 20130304T193416-681 AT post DOT gmane DOT org>	<CA+sc5mk2MgnjYA2OtaK7d7Aed_tpqXVoD=80NVQ6-uO=LNSUpw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>	<87ip57nf3r DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid>	<20130305034127 DOT 22dc8a65 AT YAAKOV04>	<loom DOT 20130305T115614-775 AT post DOT gmane DOT org> <20130306033005 DOT 411192a5 AT YAAKOV04>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/)
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Yaakov <yselkowitz <at> users.sourceforge.net> writes:
> AFAIK nothing used the BSD compat layer, it was disabled by default
> upstream, and Fedora has already updated to 5.1.  I think we can go
> ahead and do the same.

I've produced a 5.0.5 package anyway so that library will be at the latest
existing version just to be sure.  Now, the remaining problem is that updating
libmpc produces cygmpc-3.dll while gcc expects cygmpc-1.dll.  Should these be
linked (the ABI is AFAICT the same since the original cygmpc-1.dll was produced
by overriding the version number)?  After all, the trigger for the whole
exercise was to ensure that gcc doesn't pull in two different versions of
libmpfr via libmpc1...

Regards,
Achim.


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple