X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2013 10:26:14 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Shouldn't gcc-4 depend on libmpfr4 ? Message-ID: <20130305092614.GC16361@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <5131CD7E DOT 8050001 AT gmail DOT com> <20130304090904 DOT GA5468 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20130304161925 DOT GA4078 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <87ip57nf3r DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Mar 5 09:18, Achim Gratz wrote: > Achim Gratz nexgo.de> writes: > > It might be that LT_INIT is called at the wrong place > > It looks like moving LT_INIT later in the file whacked autotools into > submission. The remaining problem is that the library version changes from > cyggmp-3 to cyggmp-10. Not sure how to deal with that or if the new package > should just be libgmp10 instead of libgmp3 (I have the same problem with mpc, > the old way of forcing the version doesn't work there anymore). I think we're better of to use the upstream numbering scheme, as long as it doesn't collide with already used version numbers in the Cygwin distro. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple