X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
X-Mail-Handler: Dyn Standard SMTP by Dyn
X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse AT dyndns DOT com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/sendlabs/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information)
X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX1+ZunPcNaSNAF/zOhDDudYI
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2013 11:20:03 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: segfault in recent snapshots
Message-ID: <20130304162003.GG2875@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <f5bobf1k1w9 DOT fsf AT calexico DOT inf DOT ed DOT ac DOT uk> <20130302202911 DOT GA1371 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <f5bbob0pu70 DOT fsf AT calexico DOT inf DOT ed DOT ac DOT uk> <20130303180626 DOT GA5313 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <f5b6217wdcv DOT fsf AT calexico DOT inf DOT ed DOT ac DOT uk> <20130304131735 DOT GF2481 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20130304131735.GF2481@calimero.vinschen.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 02:17:35PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>Since you're running GDB anyway, what does `bt' print when the SEGV
>occured?

It was already posted and it didn't make sense.
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2013-03/msg00023.html

That's why I asked for the stackdump file since it exposes more of the
stack.

But, Marco has already indicated that he knows about this issue.

I don't think there is anything more that needs to be done here until
Marco releases his new package.

cgf

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple