X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2013 10:09:04 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Shouldn't gcc-4 depend on libmpfr4 ? Message-ID: <20130304090904.GA5468@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <5131CD7E DOT 8050001 AT gmail DOT com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Mar 4 07:11, Achim Gratz wrote: > marco atzeri gmail.com> writes: > > should be libmpfr4 instead of libmpfr1. > > It looks like cc1 is linked against libmpfr1 _and_ libmpfr4, so they should both > be listed as dependencies. No, the dependency is correct, but, oh well, that's something which shouldn't happen. cc1 is linked against libmpc1, which in turn is linked against libmpfr1, while cc1 is directly linked against libmpfr4. David? Any chance to create a new mpclib package which fixes this dependency problem? Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple