X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.9 required=5.0	tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
X-Received: by 10.68.56.232 with SMTP id d8mr3446337pbq.162.1361545599778;        Fri, 22 Feb 2013 07:06:39 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <51278978.20509@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 23:06:32 +0800
From: Arthur Tu <arthur DOT jim DOT tu AT gmail DOT com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130215 Thunderbird/17.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: emacs*-24.2.93-2 (TEST)
References: <announce DOT 511B7B51 DOT 4050901 AT cornell DOT edu> <loom DOT 20130220T122045-617 AT post DOT gmane DOT org> <5124C565 DOT 7000206 AT cornell DOT edu> <loom DOT 20130221T091611-154 AT post DOT gmane DOT org> <5125DFAA DOT 6040104 AT gmail DOT com> <loom DOT 20130221T103907-962 AT post DOT gmane DOT org> <51260347 DOT 4010501 AT cornell DOT edu> <loom DOT 20130222T094238-475 AT post DOT gmane DOT org> <512774B4 DOT 6090504 AT cornell DOT edu>
In-Reply-To: <512774B4.6090504@cornell.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 2/22/2013 9:37 PM, Ken Brown wrote:
> On 2/22/2013 3:47 AM, Achim Gratz wrote:
>> Ken Brown <kbrown <at> cornell.edu> writes:
>>> I think the alternatives system should work fine for most users.
>>>
>>> The problem you've described occurs only in the following situation:
>>>
>>> 1. You install both emacs-X11 and emacs-w32.
>>
>> At the moment emacs-X11 has a higher priority than emacs-w32. All things
>> considered, giving emacs-w32 priority over emacs-X11 seems to be more 
>> generally
>> useful on Cygwin than the other way around.
>
> It's hard to know what people's preferences will be.  I gave emacs-X11 
> the highest priority for two reasons:
>
> * It's been the only GUI version of emacs on Cygwin for many years, so 
> making it the default doesn't change what people are used to.
>
> * It's the build you get by default if you don't override it with 
> configure options.
>
> Maybe I should supply a script that lets users easily change the 
> priority, something like the scripts set-gcc-default-*.sh that Dave 
> Korn provided for gcc.
>
> Ken
>
>
>
> -- 
> Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
> FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
> Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
>
Agree. Good idea.

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple