X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
X-Mail-Handler: Dyn Standard SMTP by Dyn
X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse AT dyndns DOT com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/sendlabs/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information)
X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX18KDUxNHcdNCZyaKCWv/jeA
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 09:57:36 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: non-blocking accept() can hang.
Message-ID: <20130208145736.GB1184@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <CANjopZGmp+xaUg1Sn2FTmb77igMk8R=Lp9yBWyeDtDj3RP5R=g AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <loom DOT 20130205T082932-242 AT post DOT gmane DOT org> <CANjopZHH2kv0s0pitt0beFiC=tsP5bOsSBJ8TBhSWnSD-iP7fg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <1833914054 DOT 20130205154611 AT mtu-net DOT ru> <5114D604 DOT 8000807 AT towo DOT net> <886833851 DOT 20130208170514 AT mtu-net DOT ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <886833851.20130208170514@mtu-net.ru>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 05:05:14PM +0400, Andrey Repin wrote:
>Greetings, Thomas Wolff!
>
>>>>>> I found that non-blocking accept() can hang.
>>>>> [...]
>>> ...
>>> ... this issue
>>> might be fixed in latest snapshot, and you would be better to try it out and
>>> see if that's true.
>> Achim Gratz responded:
>>> It was clear from your post that you were running the release version, thank
>>> you.  I've compiled your program and it does seem to work correctly, I'm running
>>> the latest snapshot.
>> Just curious; I guess this is related to the recent tuning of select():
>> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2013-01/msg00145.html
>> Same cause, same fix?
>
>More likely, it was exactly this case, rather than the same. But to be
>certain, it'd be much better, if OP would try it out on his system and report
>any remaining issues, or a success, if no issues were left.

No, it's not the same thing.

cgf

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple