X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP,KHOP_THREADED,TW_JH X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <510FC713.8080205@myopera.com> Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 14:34:59 +0000 From: Jonas Platte User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130109 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Using jhbuild on cygwin References: <510FBA90 DOT 4000908 AT myopera DOT com> <510FBACE DOT 3030602 AT myopera DOT com> <510FBE4C DOT 6010808 AT gmail DOT com> <510FC28E DOT 9040506 AT lysator DOT liu DOT se> In-Reply-To: <510FC28E.9040506@lysator.liu.se> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 02/04/13 14:15, Peter Rosin wrote: > On 2013-02-04 14:57, marco atzeri wrote: >> On 2/4/2013 2:42 PM, Jonas Platte wrote: >>> libXft (xft.pc, required=2.0.0) >> Strange we have 2.3.1: > Is it perhaps requiring exactly 2.0.0? Wouldn't it be > required>=2.0.0 otherwise? Well some of the packages jhbuild accepts are newer than what it requires too. And there it is "required=x.x" too. Probably jhbuild just doesn't put that out perfectly. > > (There where more instances of that that I elided) > > Cheers, > Peter > > > -- > Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html > FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ > Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html > Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple > -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple