X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,TW_YG X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org X-Trace: 836524205/mk-filter-2.mail.uk.tiscali.com/B2C/$THROTTLED_DYNAMIC/b2c-CUSTOMER-DYNAMIC-IP/79.68.109.29/None/drstacey AT tiscali DOT co DOT uk X-SBRS: None X-RemoteIP: 79.68.109.29 X-IP-MAIL-FROM: drstacey AT tiscali DOT co DOT uk X-SMTP-AUTH: X-Originating-Country: GB/UNITED KINGDOM X-MUA: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130110 Thunderbird/17.0.2 X-IP-BHB: Once X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApMBAE3p+1BPRG0d/2dsb2JhbAANN7pUg3uDEQEBAQQ4QBELDQsJFg8JAwIBAgFFEwgBAbFFkWuOEIMpA5tkNY0x Message-ID: <50FBEA89.2030701@tiscali.co.uk> Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2013 13:00:57 +0000 From: David Stacey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130110 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: sqlite3-3.7.15.1-1 packages to test References: <1353415897 DOT 5592 DOT 4 DOT camel AT YAAKOV04> <50AD20AD DOT 2090908 AT etr-usa DOT com> <878v9udble DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid> <50EC902B DOT 9030407 AT etr-usa DOT com> <50FBB773 DOT 90102 AT tiscali DOT co DOT uk> <87r4lgm8un DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid> In-Reply-To: <87r4lgm8un.fsf@Rainer.invalid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 20/01/13 10:45, Achim Gratz wrote: > David Stacey writes: >> >I've done some more testing, but with little success. I ran the >> >Subversion built-in tests on sqlite3-3.7.15-1 without Warren's patch, >> >and again on sqlite3-3.7.13-1 with the new patch applied. In both >> >cases, the Subversion tests plodded along nicely and then froze after >> >about 10 hours. > Is it still freezing in FS_TYPE=bdb? If so, shouldn't you be worried > about BerkeleyDB rather than SQlite? I remember subversion being picky > about the exact version of BerkeleyDB being used and me having to > install a different one than I already had (but that's been a 1.6 > version IIRC so things might have progressed). And yes, these tests > take far too long. Thank you for your reply, Achim. Yes, the freeze happens when FS_TYPE=bdb. So if we're not concerned with this configuration (for the purposes of this thread at least), then I can change Subversion's cygport file so that we only test FS_TYPE=fsfs. This will have the happy side-effect of halving the amount of time taken to run the tests :-) If you agree that this sounds sensible then I'll run the tests again with that change to the cygport file. Cheers, Dave. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple