X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 15:42:11 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Binutils objcopy bug (was Re: rebase segfault) Message-ID: <20130116144211.GB17179@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <50F516C8 DOT 9050602 AT gmail DOT com> <20130115100745 DOT GC2353 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <50F5312A DOT 2040503 AT gmail DOT com> <20130115112406 DOT GA13752 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <50F5D246 DOT 6010902 AT gmail DOT com> <50F653AB DOT 80102 AT gmail DOT com> <20130116123509 DOT GA16991 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <50F6AD63 DOT 8080106 AT gmail DOT com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50F6AD63.8080106@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com> List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Jan 16 14:38, marco atzeri wrote: > On 1/16/2013 1:35 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >On Jan 16 08:15, marco atzeri wrote: > >>On 1/15/2013 11:03 PM, marco atzeri wrote: > >>>On 1/15/2013 12:24 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >>>>On Jan 15 11:36, marco atzeri wrote: > >>>>>On 1/15/2013 11:07 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > > > >This is a serious bug in objcopy in the current binutils. Given that > >cygport creates the debug info automatically, we might end up with > >spuriously broken DLLs in the distro. > > we already have some : > > /usr/bin/cygcrypto-1.0.0.dll > 8 .gnu_deb 0000001c 67542000 67542000 0017ac00 2**2 > > /usr/bin/cyglsa.dll > 6 .gnu_deb 00000014 10007000 10007000 00001400 2**2 > > /usr/bin/cygssl-1.0.0.dll > 8 .gnu_deb 0000001c 58fcf000 58fcf000 00059a00 2**2 Drat. > >I checked with objcopy from the older binutils 2.51.53-2, and the > >problem did not show up. I also built the latest binutils release > >2.23.1 and the problem also doesn't show, so we probably can get away > >with just a black eye by updating binutils to 2.23.1. Chris? > > > > > >Corinna I forgot to mention, the --long-section-names enable option was never default, apparently. This would have to be fixed in cygport, I guess. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple