X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <50F47A8B.5050001@cs.utoronto.ca> Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 16:37:15 -0500 From: Ryan Johnson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: stat() and tilde prefix (was bad bash tab completion) References: <5024B4D4 DOT 6080409 AT shaddybaddah DOT name> <50F395D5 DOT 4050201 AT shaddybaddah DOT name> <20130114061747 DOT GB16739 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20130114100002 DOT GA22039 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <50F417F9 DOT 8040108 AT shaddybaddah DOT name> <20130114161307 DOT GB8617 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 14/01/2013 3:24 PM, Stephan Mueller wrote: > Perhaps (as you may well have already considered): > > - replace the path prefix by the mount point first? (this may be naïve > on my part, but it's not clear to me that .. early in a path should be able > to influence which mount point is substituted) If I mount something at /foo/bar/baz, then /foo/bar/baz/../../blah definitely shouldn't end up inside baz. > - test directory existence of the component preceding .. before collapsing > (in the example above) b/.. to nothing. > - trust that for a/b3/b2/b/../../../c, the existence test of a/b3/b2/b > before collapsing b/.. to nothing implies existence of b2 and b3 so no > further tests are needed for 'runs' of .. components with enough > components before them > > Understood that this is still going to cause a slowdown because paths with > .. are not uncommon, but it would reduce the number of additional > existence checks from one-per-path-component to one-per-run-of-.., > which means none in the case of paths without .. in them. The rest seems totally reasonable to me, FWIW. I wouldn't put it past a Makefile (esp. one generated by autotools) or a gcc header search path to generate paths like: /a/b/c/d/../e/../f/../../../g/h (which resolves to a/g/h, if I counted dots correctly). Even then, though, it's "only" three checks to achieve posix-compliant behavior. Ryan -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple