X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <50F033FE.40902@cs.utoronto.ca> Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 10:47:10 -0500 From: Ryan Johnson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Clang and windows headers References: <50EEEA49 DOT 1050507 AT alice DOT it> <50EEFA40 DOT 5010506 AT alice DOT it> <50EFFA63 DOT 1080900 AT alice DOT it> In-Reply-To: <50EFFA63.1080900@alice.it> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 11/01/2013 6:41 AM, Angelo Graziosi wrote: > Yaakov wrote: > >> Forking an entire compiler within a >> source package just for building that package? > > I think ROOT guys have good reasons to have a patched version of CLANG > if the new ROOT C++ interpreter they implement is called "cling"... > > You can read more here: http://root.cern.ch/drupal/content/cling OT: if I understand right, they're not patching/forking Clang to make it a better compiler. They're essentially wrapping Clang with their own code to provide reflection and an interactive command-line interpreter for C++. That they can do it with ~7kLoC is pretty impressive. Ryan -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple