X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_05,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,TW_IW
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
X-CornellRouted: This message has been Routed already.
Message-ID: <50EC7166.4030103@cornell.edu>
Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 14:20:06 -0500
From: Ken Brown <kbrown AT cornell DOT edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Alan Thompson <thompson2526 AT gmail DOT com>
CC: cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: Re: Fwd: ctags recursion broken? [ATTN: ctags, xemacs-tags maintainers]
References: <786EBDA1AC46254B813E200779E7AD36028CB12E AT srv1163ex1 DOT flightsafety DOT com> <50C881E7 DOT 6090600 AT etr-usa DOT com> <CAN4-eHL6w3Os0xojMycq8GGV46p02oMdchMgzV0qDBT6tptBGg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAN4-eHKheeP8Eb7uwBytbmC6f0UTr=sgDEmmP34V+_8tRqizEQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <50EB473C DOT 4000402 AT cygwin DOT com> <CAN4-eHKPYiv+Nt7ZC-LNq31stxYWutOJ0yzTesgZ37N3OpJNww AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <CAN4-eHKPYiv+Nt7ZC-LNq31stxYWutOJ0yzTesgZ37N3OpJNww@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-PMX-CORNELL-SPAM-CHECKED: Pawpaw
X-Original-Sender: kbrown AT cornell DOT edu - Tue Jan  8 14:20:10 2013
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 1/8/2013 2:04 PM, Alan Thompson wrote:
> Hello - Are you still active as the Cygwin emacs maintainer?  There
> appears to be a clash between emacs and ctags as described below.
> Could you help us to resolve it?

The clash involves xemacs.  The xemacs maintainer said he would take 
care of it.  You probably missed his reply because the discussion got 
moved to the cygiwn-apps list:

   http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2012-12/msg00045.html

Ken

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple