X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,BOTNET,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-id: <50EB473C.4000402@cygwin.com> Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2013 17:07:56 -0500 From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" Reply-to: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: ctags recursion broken? [ATTN: ctags, xemacs-tags maintainers] References: <786EBDA1AC46254B813E200779E7AD36028CB12E AT srv1163ex1 DOT flightsafety DOT com> <50C881E7 DOT 6090600 AT etr-usa DOT com> In-reply-to: Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 1/7/2013 2:56 PM, Alan Thompson wrote: > Hi - It looks like there has been no movement on this bug for a month. > What is the best way to contact the emacs maintainers? It does not seem > correct for emacs (or xemacs) to overwrite the ctags executable. Actually, it's a little less than a month. ;-) The maintainer responded to it on December 12th. -- Larry _____________________________________________________________________ A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email? -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple