X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_20,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,EXECUTABLE_URI,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.24.198 with SMTP id w6mr10993911wif.27.1357588579572; Mon, 07 Jan 2013 11:56:19 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAN4-eHL6w3Os0xojMycq8GGV46p02oMdchMgzV0qDBT6tptBGg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <786EBDA1AC46254B813E200779E7AD36028CB12E AT srv1163ex1 DOT flightsafety DOT com>	<50C881E7 DOT 6090600 AT etr-usa DOT com>	<CAN4-eHL6w3Os0xojMycq8GGV46p02oMdchMgzV0qDBT6tptBGg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2013 11:56:18 -0800
Message-ID: <CAN4-eHKheeP8Eb7uwBytbmC6f0UTr=sgDEmmP34V+_8tRqizEQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: ctags recursion broken? [ATTN: ctags, xemacs-tags maintainers]
From: Alan Thompson <thompson2526 AT gmail DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Hi - It looks like there has been no movement on this bug for a month.
What is the best way to contact the emacs maintainers?  It does not seem
correct for emacs (or xemacs) to overwrite the ctags executable.
Alan Thompson

On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 5:08 AM, Warren Young <warren AT etr-usa DOT com> wrote:

 On 12/11/2012 13:05, Thrall, Bryan wrote:
>
> Yes, it looks like xemacs-tags and ctags packages both install
> /usr/bin/ctags.exe:
>
> http://cygwin.com/cgi-bin2/package-grep.cgi?grep=ctags.exe


 Is there an especially good reason xemacs-tags can't depend on ctags, and
 get its ctags.exe from my package?

 Or, is there something special about Xemacs ctags that's worth
 preserving?

 Or, maybe ctags.exe should just be removed from the Xemacs package.
 Doesn't Emacs want you to use etags anyway?

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple