X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:132.245.2.21;KIP:(null);UIP:(null);IPV:NLI;H:BN1PRD0512HT003.namprd05.prod.outlook.com;RD:none;EFVD:NLI X-SpamScore: -3 X-BigFish: PS-3(zzbb2dI98dI9371I1521Izz1de0h1202h1e76h1d1ah1d2ahzzz32i2a8h668h839h947hd25he5bhf0ah1288h12a5h12a9h12bdh137ah13b6h1441h1504h1537h153bh162dh1631h1758h1765h1155h) Message-ID: <50E4A597.1060600@coverity.com> Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2013 16:24:39 -0500 From: Tom Honermann User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Subject: Re: Intermittent failures retrieving process exit codes - snapshot test requested References: <20121222024943 DOT GA5773 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20121222031430 DOT GA8355 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <50D57818 DOT 1070706 AT gmail DOT com> <20121222175041 DOT GA14475 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20121223165621 DOT GA9935 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <50DCB454 DOT 9030400 AT coverity DOT com> <20121229215725 DOT GA18847 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <50E23F98 DOT 1060004 AT coverity DOT com> <20130101053606 DOT GB18911 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <50E48743 DOT 5040401 AT coverity DOT com> <20130102204821 DOT GA6524 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> In-Reply-To: <20130102204821.GA6524@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginatorOrg: coverity.com X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 01/02/2013 03:48 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote: > I managed to duplicate a hang by really stressing ctrl-c a loop. It > uncovers some rather amazing Windows behavior which I have to think > about. Apparently ExitThread can be called recursively within the > thread that Windows creates to handle CTRL-C. I'm glad you could reproduce. Based on your description, this sounds like a separate issue and not a regression introduced by the workarounds you put in place for the ExitProcess / ExitThread race. Correct? I wonder if this is the same issue I'm experiencing though. I'm only pressing ctrl-c once and it sounds like you might be deliving a ctrl-c to the same process multiple times. That may not be relevant to the root cause however. Tom. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple