X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <50D4AFA9.5070200@mailme.ath.cx> Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 19:51:21 +0100 From: bartels User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:10.0.11) Gecko/20121123 Icedove/10.0.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: trouble accessing samba shares with spaces and/or parentheses References: <50D48C53 DOT 2080403 AT mailme DOT ath DOT cx> <20121221164750 DOT GE18188 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <50D495D5 DOT 2030104 AT mailme DOT ath DOT cx> <20121221171916 DOT GH18188 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <50D4A64D DOT 5040301 AT mailme DOT ath DOT cx> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 12/21/2012 07:30 PM, Andrew DeFaria wrote: > On 12/21/2012 10:11 AM, bartels wrote: >> So where can I find strace? > Where did you look? > > $ type strace > strace is /bin/strace strace is one of my favourite toys on linux. Somehow, I never located it on cygwin. Never just typed in the magic word :) The packaging is a little different here, and the searching not so easy. I expected a package. > > BTW: Why the insistence on mapping it to a drive letter? Everybody always does that and I don't understand why. Drive letters change. Some > people hard code 'em in their scripts. This is a recipe for errors. Other people say sometimes that some Windows apps can't work with UNC > paths. I don't know of any that have this problem anymore. Q:/ doesn't tell me where this directly is located... No reason, really, other than the fact that Windoze forces us to access physical storage devices via the silly drive letters . Not using drive letters would mean I have two different presentations: one for local storage and one for remote storage. When in Rome . . . And is there a way to mount a network share without a drive letter, using cygwin? More importantly, is it possible to mount a network share, using cygwin, so that it becomes visible/available in explorer? The scope of mounting seems to be limited to a process (tree). Every service must mount separately. Or have I missed something? - bartels -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple