X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_05,KHOP_THREADED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,TW_YG X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <50C88134.3010904@etr-usa.com> Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 06:05:56 -0700 From: Warren Young User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Cygwin-L Subject: Re: ctags recursion broken? References: <786EBDA1AC46254B813E200779E7AD36028CB0F6 AT srv1163ex1 DOT flightsafety DOT com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 12/11/2012 13:01, Alan Thompson wrote: > Looking at the link on StackOverflow (from 2010) it may be that the > xemacs version of ctags is overwriting the default version in /bin. > Could this be the culprit? It's easy to find out: $ cygcheck -f /bin/ctags.exe You will either get back "ctags-5.8-1" or the culprit. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple