X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org X-Mail-Handler: Dyn Standard SMTP by Dyn X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse AT dyndns DOT com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/sendlabs/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information) X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX1/8JyxOdKcE6SBDEBAbf5Q9 Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2012 11:10:29 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Command line arguments Message-ID: <20121102151029.GA9495@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <1351606847888-94081 DOT post AT n5 DOT nabble DOT com> <20121031182143 DOT M67652 AT ds DOT net> <20121031194051 DOT GL67410 AT justpickone DOT org> <20121101174144 DOT M43908 AT ds DOT net> <5093DEA1 DOT 5020806 AT cs DOT umass DOT edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5093DEA1.5020806@cs.umass.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 10:54:25AM -0400, Eliot Moss wrote: >On 11/2/2012 10:32 AM, Andrew DeFaria wrote: >>On 11/02/2012 05:36 AM, Earnie Boyd wrote: > >Can we declare an end to the philosophical flames on how to write uses >of parameters in bash scripts, please? I know that I, of all people, shouldn't be encouraging this type of thing but I actually found the discussion interesting. But, you're right, and Andrew even acknowledged that the discussion had strayed and should be taken elsewhere. But, if anyone wants to continue the philosophy, I'll grant a TITTL waiver. >Maybe if we're friendly enough the OP will actually share what the real >problem was and we can offer some specific help ... Or, we could even call this whole discussion closed since it seems to have nothing to do with Cygwin and even the non-philosophical part seems to have been beaten to death. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple