X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,TW_GD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <50872610.605@cs.umass.edu> Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 19:19:44 -0400 From: Eliot Moss Reply-To: moss AT cs DOT umass DOT edu User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121010 Thunderbird/16.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: real beginer References: <1350998927796-93898 DOT post AT n5 DOT nabble DOT com> <1351002701854-93906 DOT post AT n5 DOT nabble DOT com> <5086C75A DOT 2060306 AT cs DOT umass DOT edu> <5086D14D DOT 3070406 AT gmail DOT com> <1351021580080-93918 DOT post AT n5 DOT nabble DOT com> <1351028816534-93921 DOT post AT n5 DOT nabble DOT com> <1351031752616-93926 DOT post AT n5 DOT nabble DOT com> In-Reply-To: <1351031752616-93926.post@n5.nabble.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 10/23/2012 6:35 PM, Trixie wrote: > >>>> I have liblapack-devel instaled and did ./configure and make . It took >>>> some >>>> time but it finished. >>> Did make finish successfully, returning a 0 status? Did you have a >>>> bigdft.exe file? If you type "ls bigdft" do you see an executable? >>>> (Note: The file's name is actually bigdft.exe but ls will list it as >>>> bigdft). >>> /i type ls bigdft and there's "No such file or directory" and i cant >> find >>> bigdft.exe file anywhere. That means install and make didnt finish well, >>> right? >> Probably. You could do something like: make; echo "Status from make was >> $?" Ok, so here is one thing I have found out. This package has init/locreg.f90 in one directory and linear/locReg.f90 in another. It places the .o in the *same* directory. The underlying Windows file system does not support locreg.o and locReg.o (names that differ in upper vs. lower case only) in the same directory. I am trying renaming one of the files and manually changing the makefile to see if it will build with suitable resolved names. But this is probably what happened to you, and should be referred upstream to the purveyors of the package. It's an 'evil' thing to do because it is not portable to platforms such as this and tends to be confusing even on platforms where it works ... More once I see if where this change gets me ... Eliot Moss -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple