X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_50,KHOP_THREADED,SPF_FAIL,TW_GD,URI_HEX
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 15:35:52 -0700 (PDT)
From: Trixie <yellena AT beotel DOT net>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <1351031752616-93926.post@n5.nabble.com>
In-Reply-To: <k675bo$q08$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <1350998927796-93898 DOT post AT n5 DOT nabble DOT com> <1351002701854-93906 DOT post AT n5 DOT nabble DOT com> <5086C75A DOT 2060306 AT cs DOT umass DOT edu> <5086D14D DOT 3070406 AT gmail DOT com> <1351021580080-93918 DOT post AT n5 DOT nabble DOT com> <k671qe$rq1$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> <1351028816534-93921 DOT post AT n5 DOT nabble DOT com> <k675bo$q08$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org>
Subject: Re: real beginer
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com


>>> I have liblapack-devel instaled and did ./configure and make . It took
>>> some
>>> time but it finished.
>> Did make finish successfully, returning a 0 status? Did you have a
> >> bigdft.exe file? If you type "ls bigdft" do you see an executable?
> >> (Note: The file's name is actually bigdft.exe but ls will list it as
> >> bigdft).
> > /i type ls bigdft and there's "No such file or directory" and i cant
> find
> > bigdft.exe file anywhere. That means install and make didnt finish well,
> > right?
> Probably. You could do something like: make; echo "Status from make was
> $?"

> The $? is the return status from the previous command. That will only 
> tell you if the make turned 0 for success. The output of make would be 
> much more instructive.

Nope, it didnt turned 0. it is 2. Status from make was 2.


> You really should approach the people who maintain this package and ask 
> them about it. This package is not Cygwin.

Yes i see that now. Unfortunately i lost two weeks with this. Well, my next
step is to contact someone in charge of BigDFT and ask for help.




--
View this message in context: http://cygwin.1069669.n5.nabble.com/real-beginer-tp93898p93926.html
Sent from the Cygwin list mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple