X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_THEBAT,KHOP_THREADED,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2012 10:29:47 +0400 From: Andrey Repin Reply-To: Andrey Repin Message-ID: <874764137.20121013102947@mtu-net.ru> To: julien2412 , cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Registry keys not only accessible when user In-Reply-To: <1349815868856-93419.post@n5.nabble.com> References: <1349807869703-93406 DOT post AT n5 DOT nabble DOT com> <507484C0 DOT 3070406 AT cygwin DOT com> <1349815868856-93419 DOT post AT n5 DOT nabble DOT com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Greetings, julien2412! > Now if I just run an ls /proc/registry/ HKLM>/SOFTWARE/Microsoft, I can see the registry keys I quoted only if I > launch Cygwin with admin rights. Sounds like incorrect installation or something environmental getting in the way. (Antivirus sandboxing your cygwin?) These keys are supposed to be readable by all local accounts (hence HKLM). > Anyway, I noticed that with regtool, everything was ok. > Is "regtool" the recommanded way to access (in read only) registry keys? And > so we should avoid to run things like this Perl script line: > open($fhandle, "/proc/registry/$key") ) > Julien > PS: > "uname -rs" gives "CYGWIN_NT_6.0 1.7.16 (0.262/5/3)" -- WBR, Andrey Repin (anrdaemon AT freemail DOT ru) 13.10.2012, <10:27> Sorry for my terrible english... -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple