X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,TW_HD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <506CF514 DOT 8030701 AT cygwin DOT com> From: Sean Murphy Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 09:11:13 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: hdparm 6.9-1 will not function as expected To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 8:32 AM, Earnie Boyd wrote: > On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 7:30 AM, Sean Murphy wrote: >> >> That did it. Placed the executable in /bin, and it ran as expected. >> > > You should not move /usr/sbin files to /bin. You should use > /usr/sbin/BINARY or add /usr/sbin to the PATH variable. You'll get > confused when an update seemingly replaces /usr/sbin/BINARY but you're > still using /bin/BINARY which is now older than /usr/sbin/BINARY. > > -- > Earnie Noted. Thank you, Earnie. -Sean -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple