X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,TW_YG X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Achim Gratz Subject: Re: Unwanted texlive invasion Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 07:32:39 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 26 Message-ID: References: <5061D0B4 DOT 40601 AT cs DOT utoronto DOT ca> <5061E4CA DOT 5090708 AT cornell DOT edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Ken Brown cornell.edu> writes: > This dependency is created by cygport. It's of course up to the gnuplot > maintainer (Volker Zell) whether or not he wants to override it, but I > can explain the rationale. [...] Until someone ports zypper or aptitude to Cygwin which can deal with soft requirements or recommendations, one could try to put the texlive stuff into a separate package: PKG_NAMES="${PN} ${PN}-texlive" gnuplot_CONTENTS="etc/ usr/ --exclude=usr/share/texmf-dist --exclude=usr/share/gnuplot/${myPV_MAJ_MIN}/lua" gnuplot_texlive_CONTENTS="usr/share/texmf-dist/ usr/share/gnuplot/${myPV_MAJ_MIN}/lua/" gnuplot_texlive_REQUIRES="gnuplot" However then cygport still finds all the dependencies for gnuplot and none for gnuplot-texlive (except gnuplot which has been manually added), so that will obviously need some more massaging. I'm not even sure what happens when you remove a gnuplot terminal from the installation... Regards, Achim. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple