X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_05,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <501CB163.4020904@orcon.net.nz> References: <1343734181 DOT 29442 DOT ezmlm AT cygwin DOT com> <501CB163 DOT 4020904 AT orcon DOT net DOT nz> From: Bob Heckel Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2012 17:36:21 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: libgc bug when using Gnu C nested functions To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 1:21 AM, Glyn wrote: > > > I'll either attempt to upgrade or seek a new maintainer, which might > > take a bit of time, my apologies! > > > Bob > > Great, thanks. I'm glad to know it's not a mystery, because I > imagine it would would have been quite a big one! I've found > a mostly reasonable alternative to using glibc for now, so no > hurry. Glyn, I've upgraded libgc to 7.2d and unfortunately it manifests the same failure using your test code (also fails with 7.2c). Looks like it's back to being a mystery for now. Bob -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple