X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_05,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 23:07:42 -0700 (PDT) From: thoni56 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <1346220462071-92376.post@n5.nabble.com> Subject: mingw32-gcc and posix paths MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com I'm in the process of going from gcc3 to gcc4. For one project I need to build both cygwin and win32 executables so "-mno-cygwin" to "mingw32-gcc" was an initial hurdle. However that is now sorted out, but one thing puzzles me. If the mingw32 is a cygwin cross-compiler why does it not accept paths in the host format (meaning cygwin, posix)? To me this seems very natural. Maybe I'm biased, but I see no other tools do that, expecting the command line to have the format of the *target*. mingw32-gcc also produces .d files in its native format by the way. -- View this message in context: http://cygwin.1069669.n5.nabble.com/mingw32-gcc-and-posix-paths-tp92376.html Sent from the Cygwin list mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple