X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org X-Mail-Handler: Dyn Standard SMTP by Dyn X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse AT dyndns DOT com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/sendlabs/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information) X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX1991joqShpCtSISFqFtJkv7 Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 16:36:05 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: /etc/profile Message-ID: <20120822203605.GA13385@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20120822191002 DOT GA5467 AT pris DOT crapsteak DOT org> <50353D71 DOT 9000306 AT dancol DOT org> <87ehmyllon DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87ehmyllon.fsf@Rainer.invalid> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 10:24:24PM +0200, Achim Gratz wrote: >Daniel Colascione writes: >> People execute Windows programs using Cygwin all the time. With this >> change, basic things like "cmd" and "notepad" will fail to work. >> Working with Windows programs is the *point* of Cygwin. I really don't >> think this change should go into the default startup scripts. > >The change is about giving users a choice. You can now drop a script >into profile.d that just does: > >PATH="${PATH}:${ORIGINAL_PATH}" > >and have exactly the same behaviour as you have now (and David might >consider installing that by default). Or you don't and are not bothered >by the useless stuff corporate IT adds to Windows PATH without even >checking that it works correctly on Windows, let alone together with >Cygwin. If we are changing a longstanding behavior then I agree with Daniel that this is a bad idea. You're just asking for people to be confused. If you want to make it easy to remove the Windows PATH then I guess I can see why that would be useful but it seems like anyone for whom this would be an issue would know how to do this anyway so I don't see why we have to go to great lengths to accommodate anyone who wants this. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple