X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,TW_YG
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
From: Adam Dinwoodie <Adam DOT Dinwoodie AT metaswitch DOT com>
To: "cygwin AT cygwin DOT com" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: RE: Please test snapshots
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 15:50:05 +0000
Deferred-Delivery: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 15:50:00 +0000
Message-ID: <CE9C056E12502146A72FD81290379E9A496019FE@ENFIRHMBX1.datcon.co.uk>
References: <50203227 DOT 50207 AT dancol DOT org> <50205E0E DOT 3060406 AT dancol DOT org> <20120808215909 DOT GA29761 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <loom DOT 20120809T111739-607 AT post DOT gmane DOT org> <5023CF06 DOT 2030006 AT dancol DOT org> <loom DOT 20120810T082432-17 AT post DOT gmane DOT org> <20120810142515 DOT GE11601 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <CE9C056E12502146A72FD81290379E9A49600037 AT ENFIRHMBX1 DOT datcon DOT co DOT uk> <20120816183738 DOT GA16914 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <CE9C056E12502146A72FD81290379E9A49601815 AT ENFIRHMBX1 DOT datcon DOT co DOT uk> <20120817142506 DOT GB20284 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>
In-Reply-To: <20120817142506.GB20284@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id q7HFqSXS018785

Christopher Faylor wrote
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 09:07:30AM +0000, Adam Dinwoodie wrote:
>> I'm still seeing exactly the same issue having taken the 20120816 snapshot.
>> If anything, I've been hitting the problem more.
>
> I should have asked this before:  I don't think anyone has made it clear if
> they are running the cygwin ping or the Windows one.  I've been assuming
> Cygwin.  Is that correct?

Yes, Cygwin ping. For paranoia's sake, you can check the output I pasted in my
previous email, which should look like Cygwin ping rather than Windows ping
output. Also:

    $ cygcheck -c ping
    Cygwin Package Information
    Package              Version        Status
    ping                 1.0-1          OK

    $ cygcheck -f $(which ping)
    ping-1.0-1

    $ which ping
    /usr/bin/ping

    $ cygcheck ping
    Found: C:\cygwin\bin\ping.exe
    Found: C:\Windows\system32\ping.exe
    C:\cygwin\bin\ping.exe
      C:\cygwin\bin\cygwin1.dll
        C:\Windows\system32\KERNEL32.dll
          C:\Windows\system32\API-MS-Win-Core-RtlSupport-L1-1-0.dll
          C:\Windows\system32\ntdll.dll
            ...blah blah blah...

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple