X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <502D4DA9.6080003@cornell.edu> Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 15:44:41 -0400 From: Ken Brown User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Please test snapshots References: <50203227 DOT 50207 AT dancol DOT org> <50205E0E DOT 3060406 AT dancol DOT org> <20120808215909 DOT GA29761 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <5023CF06 DOT 2030006 AT dancol DOT org> <20120810142515 DOT GE11601 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20120816183738 DOT GA16914 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <502D45E6 DOT 5060108 AT cornell DOT edu> <20120816192636 DOT GC16945 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> In-Reply-To: <20120816192636.GC16945@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-CORNELL-SPAM-CHECKED: Pawpaw X-Original-Sender: kbrown AT cornell DOT edu - Thu Aug 16 15:44:40 2012 X-PMX-CORNELL-REASON: CU_White_List_Override X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 8/16/2012 3:26 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 03:11:34PM -0400, Ken Brown wrote: >> With the current snapshot (20120816 17:19:27), I have problems with >> emacs-X11.exe. When I start it under X (by typing 'emacs&' in an xterm >> window), its CPU usage goes up to 50% and its window never displays. >> The attached file gives the result of attaching gdb and giving the >> command 'thread apply all bt full'. >> >> I reproduced this running emacs under mintty, but it took longer for it >> to happen. >> >> The problem doesn't occur with the 20120815 snapshot. > > It's funny how the simple explanation of a problem can trigger a > "Oh #(*&$. I know what I did." > > In this case, I made my standard "reverse the sense of a ? operator" > mistake. > > I'm generating a new snapshot which seems to fix the problem. Confirmed. Thanks. Ken -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple