X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org X-Mail-Handler: Dyn Standard SMTP by Dyn X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse AT dyndns DOT com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/sendlabs/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information) X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX19K22/MZMoACr3xouiis9t7 Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 15:26:36 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Please test snapshots Message-ID: <20120816192636.GC16945@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <50203227 DOT 50207 AT dancol DOT org> <50205E0E DOT 3060406 AT dancol DOT org> <20120808215909 DOT GA29761 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <5023CF06 DOT 2030006 AT dancol DOT org> <20120810142515 DOT GE11601 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20120816183738 DOT GA16914 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <502D45E6 DOT 5060108 AT cornell DOT edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <502D45E6.5060108@cornell.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 03:11:34PM -0400, Ken Brown wrote: >With the current snapshot (20120816 17:19:27), I have problems with >emacs-X11.exe. When I start it under X (by typing 'emacs&' in an xterm >window), its CPU usage goes up to 50% and its window never displays. >The attached file gives the result of attaching gdb and giving the >command 'thread apply all bt full'. > >I reproduced this running emacs under mintty, but it took longer for it >to happen. > >The problem doesn't occur with the 20120815 snapshot. It's funny how the simple explanation of a problem can trigger a "Oh #(*&$. I know what I did." In this case, I made my standard "reverse the sense of a ? operator" mistake. I'm generating a new snapshot which seems to fix the problem. I meant to run my normal raft of exhaustive tests: - run bash in console - run mintty - run X - start emacs but I missed the last two. Duh. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple