X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org X-Mail-Handler: Dyn Standard SMTP by Dyn X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse AT dyndns DOT com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/sendlabs/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information) X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX1/VmfLU5oJr1LetCqKIrOzr Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 00:55:53 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Perl 5.14 and XML::Parser Message-ID: <20120816045553.GA8687@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <91D7F7CEBD3E804FA475882D8920476C281DA3E6DE AT dc-ex1 DOT power DOT com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <91D7F7CEBD3E804FA475882D8920476C281DA3E6DE@dc-ex1.power.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 10:04:48PM -0600, Thomas Wicklund wrote: >The update of perl on to 5.14 moved some perl modules to a new >perl_vendor package which is not installed by default. The >announcement I found stated that perl_vendor is modules "which are >mainly required to build and test and report test results of other CPAN >modules." > >I find that the XML::Parser module (at least) has been moved. I've >been using this module for years to parse XML output for a set of >Subversion tools. I had a couple hours of digging today to figure out >why a coworker started getting errors after updating Cygwin, then >figuring out the new package. > >As an occasional user of perl I would much prefer that the maximum >number of packages be included in the distribution (since disk space >and bandwidth are constantly becoming cheaper) than to have to spend >time figuring out why something can't be found. It seems like you're scolding the perl package maintainer (who provides you with a valuable service for free) for having the audacity to change something while providing information about the change in his release announcement. I prefer to hear from users who are savvy enough to update packages while understanding that valuable information will be included in the package upgrade announcement and who will make accommodations based on that fact. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r8H7Rk_JP60 -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple