X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.6 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_40,BOTNET,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-id: <502A850A.6040109@cygwin.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 13:04:10 -0400
From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-to: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0
MIME-version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: imagemagick errors under cygwin on 64-bit Win 7 system
References: <loom DOT 20120812T142816-982 AT post DOT gmane DOT org> <5027B4AC DOT 7070407 AT gmail DOT com>	<loom DOT 20120814T020312-509 AT post DOT gmane DOT org> <CE9C056E12502146A72FD81290379E9A495FFE3C AT ENFIRHMBX1 DOT datcon DOT co DOT uk> <502A5675 DOT 8010202 AT gmail DOT com> <CANLSjUteBXH7P6fBFqsvK3S_F2kZdVT9Qn9wpYGAX-R-4GEPog AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20120814150922 DOT GD18059 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <CANLSjUtVqVLP3jT3H3oBHT87Bfxe3ssRWBp9q2n_DRLv6Z2vxg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
In-reply-to: <CANLSjUtVqVLP3jT3H3oBHT87Bfxe3ssRWBp9q2n_DRLv6Z2vxg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 8/14/2012 11:56 AM, Paul Thompson wrote:
>>
>> Wow.  That's rather unexpected.  Unfortunately the error code -2 is just
>> an artefact, not the actual error code.  I fixed that in CVS.  Did you
>> try if rebaseall fixes this issue?
>>
>>
>
> OK, I just learned about rebaseall. I am not actually on the machine
> in question, and will try this tonight. I will report tomorrow on
> results.
>
> I will say that I did just do a fresh install of cygwin for this.
> Should cygwin work straight out of the box, or is the rebaseall needed
> to tailor to specific machine?

If you just went to cygwin.com and installed using the "setup.exe" link
from there, then you shouldn't need to take the added step of running
rebaseall if all else about the installation is proper.  Still, it won't
hurt to try it.

-- 
Larry

_____________________________________________________________________

A: Yes.
 > Q: Are you sure?
 >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
 >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple