X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0	tests=BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,SPF_NEUTRAL,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <50298001.50502@cornell.edu>
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 18:30:25 -0400
From: Ken Brown <kbrown AT cornell DOT edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Cygwin setup scrambled permissions
References: <CAG9p0OTFfN+Za6wikt9Aa-1RqtKKCr7M39YHuwDHNKqbdPjpfQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>	<CAG9p0ORVO1F=vTgg-nEF0UBcdEMaOLOFh5LFnbSMeLm1mz0q8A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>	<50291FED DOT 4090705 AT cornell DOT edu> <CAG9p0OTCQQEWTPsFARtE1wz7+uTWkWJ7nygs_6Z9dqF3BLFEzQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <CAG9p0OTCQQEWTPsFARtE1wz7+uTWkWJ7nygs_6Z9dqF3BLFEzQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-PMX-CORNELL-SPAM-CHECKED: Pawpaw
X-Original-Sender: kbrown AT cornell DOT edu - Mon Aug 13 18:30:29 2012
X-PMX-CORNELL-REASON: CU_White_List_Override
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 8/13/2012 5:49 PM, Lord Laraby wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Ken Brown wrote:
>>>
>>> D:\Programs\cygwin\etc\postinstall>autorebase.bat
>>> /usr/lib/perl5/5.14/i686-cygwin-threads-64int/CORE/cygperl5_14_2.dll:
>>> skipped be
>>> cause nonexistent.
>>
>>
>> This is just a warning, which you can ignore.  See
>> Ken
>
> Aye. That I see now. However, shouldn't autorebase.bat actually do
> something? Or is it not like rebaseall? My guess is it's only trying
> to rebase that specific file and failing. If that's so, I'm fine with
> it.

autorebase.bat does run rebaseall, and there's no reason to think it 
isn't doing anything.  It's not failing; it's just reporting that there 
was one specific file that it couldn't rebase.  If there's no other 
error message, you can assume it did its job.

Ken


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple