X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,RDNS_NONE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <5028B9D5.6050007@gmx.de> Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 10:24:53 +0200 From: Herbert Stocker User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Side-by-side configuration is incorrect reported as permission denied References: <5025C431 DOT 7050201 AT cygwin DOT com> <20120812170641 DOT GC32748 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20120812205407 DOT GA7337 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Hi, Imho, EACCESS is indeed a bit misleading because it suggests permission problems. Better would be to have an EFAIL as a generic error. Actually i was missing an EFAIL several times when my programs needed to return an error code that did not match well with what i found in errno.h . On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 11:07:00AM +0200, Pawel Jasinski wrote: > If you can find a nice Linux errno which maps from ERROR_SXS_CANT_GEN_ACTCTX > to something other than EACCES I'd be happy to change Cygwin. I had a quick poke into sys/errno.h and there i found 5 error codes beginning with ELIB. One of those should suffice. My fafourite is this: #define ELIBBAD 84. /* Accessing a corrupted shared lib */ Because side-by-side problems may mean that the supporting DLL is acutally there and can be read (also for execute), but the accompanying XML file describes it incorrectly (e.g. wrong version number), the DLL is not signed correctly, is not placed in the subdirectory whose name is mandated by Windows, etc. > Otherwise, no, I'm not going to worry about this issue. There is no need for the 'no', i'd suggest ELIBBAD. (And to bring back to memory, i'd also suggest to add EFAIL be added) Herbert P.S.: thanks for the hint, Pawel. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple