X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,TW_SV,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <502263A3.6080409@etr-usa.com> Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 07:03:31 -0600 From: Warren Young User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; WOW64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: cygwin 1.7.15: svn disk I/O error References: <50206AE0 DOT 90101 AT etr-usa DOT com> <50207BAC DOT 7030306 AT etr-usa DOT com> <50215120 DOT 4030207 AT acm DOT org> In-Reply-To: <50215120.4030207@acm.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 8/7/2012 11:32 AM, David Rothenberger wrote: > On 8/6/2012 7:21 PM, Warren Young wrote: >> Some time after *that*, at a future time entirely up to the Subversion >> packages' maintainer, David Rothenberger, Subversion will be rebuilt >> against those new SQLite packages. > > Is that actually necessary? SVN is dynamically linked to SQLite, so a > recompile isn't necessary unless the ABI for SQLite changes, right? I was just recalling your -3 and -4 packages, rebuilt after my last SQLite release, partly to see if rebuilding would fix the svn+sqlite problems. You are right that that might not have done anything, and that consequently a rebuild won't be necessary or helpful now either. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple